Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Genetics
- Vol. 7 (1), 55-65
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1749
Abstract
In just a few years, microarrays have gone from obscurity to being almost ubiquitous in biological research. At the same time, the statistical methodology for microarray analysis has progressed from simple visual assessments of results to a weekly deluge of papers that describe purportedly novel algorithms for analysing changes in gene expression. Although the many procedures that are available might be bewildering to biologists who wish to apply them, statistical geneticists are recognizing commonalities among the different methods. Many are special cases of more general models, and points of consensus are emerging about the general approaches that warrant use and elaboration.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Development and Evaluation of Microarray Gene Expression Data FiltersJournal of Computational Biology, 2005
- Tight Clustering: A Resampling‐Based Approach for Identifying Stable and Tight Patterns in DataBiometrics, 2005
- Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimatesBiostatistics, 2004
- Statistical concerns about the GSEA procedureNature Genetics, 2004
- Variance-modeled posterior inference of microarray data: detecting gene-expression changes in 3T3-L1 adipocytesBioinformatics, 2004
- Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-valuesBioinformatics, 2003
- PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetesNature Genetics, 2003
- Microarray data normalization and transformationNature Genetics, 2002
- Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation responseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Power and money: Designing statistically powerful studies while minimizing financial costs.Psychological Methods, 1997