Use of Home-Obtained Vaginal Swabs to Facilitate Rescreening for Chlamydia trachomatis Infections
- 1 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 118 (2), 231-239
- https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182246a83
Abstract
To determine whether the use of home-based, self-obtained vaginal swabs among women who were treated for Chlamydia infection can increase rescreening rates in comparison with clinic-based rescreening, and to identify subgroups in which rescreening could be enhanced using self-obtained vaginal swabs. Two randomized trials were conducted: one with enrollment in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics and the other in family planning clinics. Study participants were recruited from STD (n = 880) and family planning clinics (n = 412) in three cities. Females aged 16 years or older who were treated for Chlamydia infection were randomly assigned to the home group (swab collection kits mailed to home) or the clinic group (made clinic appointments) for rescreening at 3 months after treatment, with reminder calls about 2 weeks before the scheduled rescreening date. Groups were similar with respect to age and other demographic characteristics. Women assigned to the home group had higher rescreening rates than those in the clinic group. In STD clinics, rescreening rates were 26.7% (home) compared with 19.1% (clinic) (P = .01). In family planning clinics, rescreening rates were 40.8% (home) compared with 20.7% (clinic) (P<.001). Among women reached by reminder calls, rescreening rates were also significantly higher in the home groups: 43.5% compared with 33.0% in STD clinic participants and 59.2% compared with 37.8% in family planning clinic participants (both P<.05). The rates of reinfection ranged from 12.9% to 19.4%, and the differences by group were not statistically significant (P ≥ .3). In STD and family planning clinics, use of home-based, self-obtained vaginal swabs resulted in significant increases in rescreening rates compared with rescreening in the clinic. Home-based specimen collection can be an alternative to clinic-based rescreening for Chlamydia infection in women. Clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 00132457. I.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short message service reminder intervention doubles sexually transmitted infection/HIV re-testing rates among men who have sex with menSexually Transmitted Infections, 2011
- Home Compared With Clinic-Based Screening for Sexually Transmitted InfectionsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- From the NIH: Proceedings of a Workshop on the Importance of Self-Obtained Vaginal Specimens for Detection of Sexually Transmitted InfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2008
- Cost Comparisons between Home- and Clinic-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in High-Risk Young WomenInfectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Population-Based Outreach for Chlamydia Screening in Men: Results From a Randomized TrialSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2007
- Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young menJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2007
- Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trialSexually Transmitted Infections, 2007
- Rescreening for Gonorrhea and Chlamydial Infection Through the MailSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004
- Patient-Delivered Partner Treatment With Azithromycin to Prevent Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Among WomenSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2003
- Risk Factors for Chlamydia trachomatis Pelvic Inflammatory Disease among Sex Workers in Nairobi, KenyaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996