Measuring Quality of Care
- 26 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 335 (13), 966-970
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199609263351311
Abstract
Until recently, we relied primarily on professional judgment to ensure that patients received high-quality medical care. Hospitals routinely monitored poor outcomes, such as deaths or infections, to identify ways to improve the quality of care. In rare cases, medical societies reviewed the performance of physicians. However, monitoring of and improvement in quality were generally left to individual clinicians.This situation has changed dramatically. We have learned that practice patterns and the quality of medical care vary much more than many people had realized, our ability to measure the quality of care has advanced considerably, and clinicians are increasingly interested in . . .Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomesJAMA, 1995
- Thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Keeping the unfulfilled promisesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- The Utility of Severity of Illness Information in Assessing the Quality of Hospital CareMedical Care, 1992
- Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard carePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Interracial Access to Selected Cardiac Procedures for Patients Hospitalized with Coronary Artery Disease in New York StateMedical Care, 1991
- Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality ratesJAMA, 1990
- 2. Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality A TaxonomyMedical Care, 1990
- Outcomes ManagementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Involving Consumers in Quality of Care AssessmentHealth Affairs, 1988
- Health Care Access and Use Among Handicapped Students in Five Public School SystemsMedical Care, 1986