Discourses of Objection: Towards an Understanding of Third-Party Rights in Planning
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 36 (9), 1549-1570
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a36176
Abstract
Public participation is central to the practice, legitimacy, and dominant normative principles of spatial planning. It has a strong presence in the discourse of communicative governance, which suggests that participatory rights should be strengthened as part of a systematic institutional design. Interest in the concept of rights within planning has been gathering pace, but is still undeveloped. In terms of third-party rights, attention has been focused on citizens as rights claimants and their use of rights to promote self-interest, rather than the values that should be protected by such rights or the balance of rights between different stakeholders. This paper explores some of the theoretical issues related to third-party rights in planning, using the existing literature on planning disputes to contextualise current debate. It examines a case study of third-party appellants in the Republic of Ireland and identifies five distinct ‘discourses of objection’. These discourses highlight the complex factors that stimulate third-party rights-claims and illustrate how they can be related to issues such as citizenship, the public interest, and property rights. The paper concludes with a number of general observations on the nature of rights in planning and the implications this has for the broader paradigm of communicative governance.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Civic Attitudes and Engagement in Modern BritainParliamentary Affairs, 2003
- Discourse and Urban Change: Introduction to the Special IssueUrban Studies, 1999
- Planning theory revisited*European Planning Studies, 1998
- Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoningProgress in Planning, 1997
- Foucauldian discourse: Power and truth in Urban and regional policy makingEuropean Planning Studies, 1996
- Equity, social justice, and planning for access and disabled people: An international perspectiveInternational Planning Studies, 1996
- Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on Facility SitingUrban Studies, 1994
- Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBYJournal of the American Planning Association, 1993
- Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY SyndromeJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992
- Towards a people‐sensitive planningPlanning Practice & Research, 1990