Determining Areas of Strengths and Weaknesses on the Stanford-Binet
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in School Psychology Review
- Vol. 9 (2), 174-177
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1980.12086546
Abstract
Sattler's SD technique for interpreting strengths and weaknesses on the Stanford-Binet has been simplified by Kaufman and Waterstreet in the form of an easy-to-use table. In their table, ranges of normal variability have been calculated for different CA and MA baselines. Unfortunately, improper estimates of normal variability occur when using their table because the CA and MA values are rounded off to the nearest half-year or full year of age. Therefore, a refinement of their table is presented, with an example to demonstrate its use.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- The president reports—performance, instruction, and nonsenseNSPI Journal, 1979
- Determining a child's strong and weak areas of functioning on the Stanford-Binet: A simplication of Sattler's SD methodJournal of School Psychology, 1978