The Combination of Meropenem and Levofloxacin Is Synergistic with Respect to both Pseudomonas aeruginosa Kill Rate and Resistance Suppression
Open Access
- 1 June 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 54 (6), 2646-2654
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00065-10
Abstract
New approaches are needed for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. All available single agents are suboptimal, especially for resistance suppression. Classical β-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations are not used often enough at least in part because of concern for nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the combination of meropenem and levofloxacin against the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type and its isogenic MexAB pump-overexpressed mutant. The drugs were studied using an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic infection model. There were 16 different regimens evaluated for both isolates. Both total population and resistant subpopulations were quantified. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The impact of monotherapy versus that of combination therapy for attainment of a 3-log cell kill and for resistance suppression was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Drug exposures were calculated by fitting the concentration-time data using the ADAPT II package of programs. For both isolates, monotherapy allowed resistance emergence with all but the largest exposure or with all exposures. In contrast, there was no resistance emergence with any combination regimen. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in time to attainment of a 3-log cell kill as well as time to resistance emergence for monotherapy and combination therapy for both isolates, in favor of the combination regimens. Determination of the pharmacodynamic indices associated with resistance suppression demonstrated a 2- to 3-fold reduction with the use of combinations. Combination therapy with meropenem and levofloxacin provides a significantly faster time to attain a 3-log cell kill and significantly better resistance suppression than does either monotherapy. This combination should be evaluated in a clinical trial.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differing Effects of Combination Chemotherapy with Meropenem and Tobramycin on Cell Kill and Suppression of Resistance of Wild-Type Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Its Isogenic MexAB Efflux Pump-Overexpressed MutantAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2009
- Impact of Drug‐Exposure Intensity and Duration of Therapy on the Emergence ofStaphylococcus aureusResistance to a Quinolone AntimicrobialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007
- The Relationship between Quinolone Exposures and Resistance Amplification Is Characterized by an Inverted U: a New Paradigm for Optimizing Pharmacodynamics To Counterselect ResistanceAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill PatientsA Multinational, Multicenter StudyJAMA, 2005
- Selection of a Moxifloxacin Dose That Suppresses Drug Resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis,by Use of an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Infection Model and Mathematical ModelingThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Effect of 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine in an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model system correlates with results of dose-ranging clinical studiesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1994
- Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study GroupAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1994
- Two compartment kinetic model with multiple artificial capillary unitsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1985
- In-vitro model for simultaneous simulation of the serum kinetics of two drugs with different half-livesJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1985
- Empiric Therapy with Carbenicillin and Gentamicin for Febrile Patients with Cancer and GranulocytopeniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971