Comparison of continuous versus intermittent furosemide administration in postoperative pediatric cardiac patients

Abstract

To compare the effects of furosemide administered by intermittent iv infusion vs. continuous iv infusion on urine output, hemodynamic variables, and serum electrolyte concentrations. Prospective, randomized trial. Pediatric ICU. Postoperative pediatric cardiac patients. Patients were assigned to either the continuous iv infusion or the intermittent infusion groups. The intermittent group received 1 mg/kg iv of furosemide every 4 hrs to be increased by 0.25 mg/kg iv every 4 hrs to a maximum of 1.5 mg/kg iv if the urine output was <1 mg/kg·hr. The continuous infusion group received an initial furosemide dose of 0.1 mg/kg iv (minimum 1 mg) followed by an iv infusion rate of 0.1 mg/kg·hr of furosemide to be doubled every 2 hrs to a maximum of 0.4 mg/kg·hr if the urine output was <1 mL/kg·hr. Demographic variables, fluids, electrolyte and inotropic requirements were the same in both groups. A significantly (p = .045) lower daily dose of furosemide (4.90 ± 1.78 vs. 6.23 ± 0.62 mg/kg·day) in the continuous iv infusion group produced the same 24-hr urine volume as that of the intermittent group. There was more variability in urine output in the intermittent group as well as more urinary losses of sodium (0.29 ± 0.15 vs. 0.20 ± 0.06 mmol/kg·day, p = .0007) and chloride (0.40 ± 0.20 vs. 0.30 ± 0.12 mmol/kg·day, p = .045). Furosemide administered by continuous iv infusion is advantageous in the post-operative pediatric patient because of a more controlled and predictable urine output with less drug requirement and less urinary loss in sodium and chloride. (Crit Care Med 1992; 20:17)