Evaluating the Loudness of Phantom Auditory Perception (Tinnitus) in Rats
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 33 (4), 202-217
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099409071881
Abstract
Using our behavioral paradigm for evaluating tinnitus, the loudness of salicylate-induced tinnitus was evaluated in 144 rats by comparing their behavioral responses induced by different doses of salicylate to those induced by different intensities of a continuous reference tone mimicking tinnitus. Group differences in resistance to extinction were linearly related to salicylate dose and, at moderate intensities, to the reference tone as well. Comparison of regression equations for salicylate versus tone effects permitted estimation of the loudness of salicylate-induced tinnitus. These results extend the animal model of tinnitus and provide evidence that the loudness of phantom auditory perception is expressed through observable behavior, can be evaluated, and its changes detected.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quinine-Induced Tinnitus in RatsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1991
- Concentration‐response relationships for salicylate‐induced ototoxicity in normal volunteers.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1989
- An animal model for tinnitusThe Laryngoscope, 1988
- Phantom auditory sensation in rats: An animal model for tinnitus.Behavioral Neuroscience, 1988
- Safety signals can mimic responses in reducing the ulcerogenic effects of prior shockPhysiological Psychology, 1985
- Aspirin-induced hearing loss as a model of sensorineural hearing lossHearing Research, 1984
- Audition: Some Relations Between Normal and Pathological HearingAnnual Review of Psychology, 1983
- Auditory sensitivity of the albino rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977
- Persistence of dynamism effects in rats following auditory intensity differentiationLearning and Motivation, 1972
- Stimulus intensity dynamism.Psychological Bulletin, 1965