Nifedipine and conventional therapy for unstable angina pectoris: a randomized, double-blind comparison.
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 69 (4), 728-739
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.69.4.728
Abstract
To characterize the potential of nifedipine in the therapy of unstable angina pectoris a blinded, randomly assigned, titrated schedule of conventional therapy (propranolol, if not contraindicated, and isosorbide dinitrate) or nifedipine for 14 days was implemented in 126 patients hospitalized in a coronary care unit for ischemic chest pain of < 45 min duration. There were no significant differences between conventionally and nifedipine-treated patients with regard to the time to relief of pain as judged by life table analysis, the decrease in anginal attacks/24 h from day 0 to day 2 (-2.5 .+-. 0.4 for conventional therapy vs. -2.8 .+-. 0.3 for nifedipine), the decrease in the number of nitroglycerin tablets consumed/24 h (-2.0 .+-. 0.5 for conventional vs. -2.1 .+-. 0.4 for nifedipine therapy), the percentage of patients requiring morphine on day 1 (13% for conventional vs. 21% for nifedipine therapy), or the percentage of patients who developed infarction (14% in both groups). Among the 27 patients who did not respond to initial conventional (n = 13) or nifedipine therapy (n = 14), 5 in each group became pain free when the opposite therapy (either nifedipine or conventional therapy) was added. In the subgroup of 67 patients who were receiving propranolol before randomization, addition of nifedipine was more effective in controlling pain than was an increase in conventional therapy (P = 0.026). In the subgroup of 59 patients not receiving prior propranolol, initiation of conventional therapy produced more rapid pain relief than initiation of nifedipine therapy alone (P < 0.001), which tended to increase heart rate. For the study population as a whole, therapy with nifedipine alone was equivalent to conventional therapy for unstable angina, although this overall equivalence may result from a combination of superiority of nifedipine therapy in patients previously receiving .beta.-blocker therapy and superiority of .beta.-blocker therapy in patients not previously receiving .beta.-blockers.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protective Effects of Aspirin against Acute Myocardial Infarction and Death in Men with Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The additive antianginal action of oral nifedipine in patients receiving propranolol: magnitude and duration of effect.Circulation, 1982
- Randomized withdrawal from nifedipine: Placebo-controlled study in patients with coronary artery spasmAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Nifedipine in Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Nifedipine in the treatment of unstable angina, coronary spasm and myocardial ischemiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Prevalence of Total Coronary Occlusion during the Early Hours of Transmural Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Treatment of angina at rest with nifedipine: A short-term controlled studyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Sequence of events in angina at rest: primary reduction in coronary flow.Circulation, 1980
- Approach to the management of unstable anginaAmerican Heart Journal, 1979
- Reflections on the use of propranolol in angina pectorisAmerican Heart Journal, 1970