Urine Screening Strategy Employing Dipstick Analysis and Selective Culture: An Evaluation
Open Access
- 1 May 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 81 (5), 634-642
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/81.5.634
Abstract
A cost-effective urinalysis test strategy, employing screening dipstick analysis with sediment microscopy performed on urines positive for leukocyte esterase, nitrite, protein, or blood, is evaluated. Screening urine culture is done when 2≥5 WBC/HPF, >10 bacteria/HPF, or yeasts are found on sediment microscopy. Predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of the test strategy in predicting significant bacteriuria is compared with sediment microscopy, Gram staining of uncentrifuged urine and leukocyte chamber counting. Employment of the test protocol for routine urine specimens would decrease sediment microscopy by 49%, while effectively screening for significant bacteriuria with a sensitivity of 88.9% and predictive value of a negative result of 98.8%.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of leukocyte esterase activity as a rapid screening technique for bacteriuriaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1982
- Detection of Significant Bacteriuria by Microscopic Examination of UrineLaboratory Medicine, 1981
- Rapid detection of pyuria by leukocyte esterase activityJAMA, 1981
- Detection of Urinary Leukocytes by Chemstrip-LJournal of Urology, 1981
- Usefulness of Macroscopic Urinalysis as a Screening Procedure: A Preliminary ReportAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- Urinary Nitrite and Urinary-tract InfectionAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1978