Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Human Behaviour
- Vol. 4 (5), 460-471
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behaviour with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.This publication has 223 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing the Happiness Effects of Real and On-Line FriendsPLOS ONE, 2013
- The sciences of science communicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
- Rethinking the Emotional BrainNeuron, 2012
- Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal studySocial Science & Medicine, 2012
- Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious OutbreaksPLOS ONE, 2010
- Zero-Sum Bias: Perceived Competition Despite Unlimited ResourcesFrontiers in Psychology, 2010
- Positive Interactions Promote Public CooperationScience, 2009
- Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humansProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Five Rules for the Evolution of CooperationScience, 2006
- Who trusts others?Journal of Public Economics, 2002