Ecological Modernization and Its Critics: Assessing the Past and Looking Toward the Future
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 14 (8), 701-709
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920152524891
Abstract
The theory of ecological modernization has received growing attention over the past decade, but in the process, it has been interpreted in conflicting and sometimes contradictory ways. In this article, we attempt to bring greater clarity to the discussion. Reviewing the works both by the theory's best-known proponents and by its most outspoken critics, we note that difficulties are created not just by the combining of theoretical predictions and policy prescriptions - a point that has already been noted in the literature - but also by the stark and highly significant differences in expectations between ecological modernization and most prevailing theories of society-environment relationships. Perhaps in part because of these differences, disagreements have often been expressed in stark, black-and-white terms. If the problems are to be resolved, there will be a need for greater theoretical precision, developed in conjunction with empirical research that is more focused, more finely differentiated, and more rigorous.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing countriesEnvironmental Politics, 2000
- Transitional economiesEnvironmental Politics, 2000
- Ecological modernization and the environmental transition of Europe: between national variations and common denominatorsJournal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1999
- Publics in historyTheory and Society, 1999
- Ecological modernisation, ecological modernitiesEnvironmental Politics, 1996
- Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social changeSociety & Natural Resources, 1992
- On the two contradictions of capitalismCapitalism Nature Socialism, 1991