Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- open peer-commentary
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 5 (2), 217-218
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00011444
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 117 references indexed in Scilit:
- Would-Be Academician Pirates PapersScience, 1980
- Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data.American Psychologist, 1980
- The meaning of ecologically oriented inquiry in contemporary psychology.American Psychologist, 1979
- Getting publishedCognitive Therapy and Research, 1978
- Doing what comes naturally: A reply to Professor Skinner.American Psychologist, 1977
- On the psychology of experimental surprises.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977
- Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1977
- Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific DisciplinesSocial Forces, 1977
- The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959