TOLERABILITY OF HIGH ENERGY TRANSURETHRAL MICROWAVE THERMOTHERAPY WITH TOPICAL URETHRAL ANESTHESIA
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 160, 772-776
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199809010-00039
Abstract
We determine the tolerability of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy with topical urethral anesthesia alone without supplementary systemic sedoanalgesia. A total of 45 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy using either topical urethral anesthesia alone (topical anesthesia group) or topical anesthesia with adjunctive intravenous sedoanalgesia (sedoanalgesia group). Pain was evaluated sequentially by means of a 0 to 10 visual analog scale score. Posttreatment followup included determinations of International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine, and quality of life score at 6 and 12 weeks. Upon commencement of microwave treatment mean visual analog scale score was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.7) in the sedoanalgesia group and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9) in the topical anesthesia group. During therapy visual analog scale score increased to a peak at 30 minutes of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.6) in the sedoanalgesia and topical anesthesia groups, respectively. Thereafter, visual analog scale score continuously declined, falling to 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.2) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.3) in the 2 respective groups by 1 hour following conclusion of the treatment period. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the treatment profile of visual analog scale scores (p = 0.701). Significant posttreatment improvements were demonstrated in International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine and quality of life scores but there were no significant differences between the groups in the magnitude of improvement in these outcome measures. High energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is well tolerated by patients under topical anesthesia alone and, therefore, can be administered in the outpatient setting without potent medications that necessitate intensive patient monitoring, pose risks for side effects and add to treatment costs.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Novel Transurethral Microwave Thermal Ablation System to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Clinical TrialJournal of Urology, 1997
- Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy v Sham Treatment: Double-Blind Randomized StudyJournal of Endourology, 1996
- Transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral resection for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: a prospective randomized study with a 2‐year follow‐upBritish Journal of Urology, 1995
- Responders and Non-Responders to Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Transurethral Microwave ThermotherapyScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1995
- A Sham Controlled Trial of Transurethral Microwave Therapy with Subsequent Treatment of the Control GroupJournal of Urology, 1994
- Transurethral microwave thermotherapy(TUMT) in benign prostatic hyperplasia: Placebo versus tumtUrology, 1994
- Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A 2-Year Follow-Up StudyJournal of Endourology, 1993
- Transurethral microwave treatment for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a randomised controlled clinical trial.BMJ, 1993
- Sham versus transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic bladder outflow obstructionThe Lancet, 1993
- Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaEuropean Urology, 1993