Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 September 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 7 (9), e1000326
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
Abstract
Hilda Bastian and colleagues examine the extent to which critical summaries of clinical trials can be used by health professionals and the public.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Updating Systematic Reviews: An International SurveyPLOS ONE, 2010
- The origins, evolution, and future ofThe Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceThe Lancet, 2009
- Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature AnalysisPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- THE TYPICAL COCHRANE REVIEWInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2002
- The Work of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit: One Example of Technology Assessment in Perinatal CareInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- DECREASED SURVIVAL RELATED TO IRRADIATION POSTOPERATIVELY IN EARLY OPERABLE BREAST CANCERThe Lancet, 1974
- The evaluation of new drugs. Current Food and drug Administration regulations and statistical aspects of clinical trialsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1967