Immunological Variation Between Inbred Laboratory Mouse Strains
- 30 November 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Veterinary Pathology
- Vol. 49 (1), 32-43
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985811429314
Abstract
Inbred laboratory mouse strains are highly divergent in their immune response patterns as a result of genetic mutations and polymorphisms. The generation of genetically engineered mice (GEM) has, in the past, used embryonic stem (ES) cells for gene targeting from various 129 substrains followed by backcrossing into more fecund mouse strains. Although common inbred mice are considered “immune competent,” many have variations in their immune system—some of which have been described—that may affect the phenotype. Recognition of these immune variations among commonly used inbred mouse strains is essential for the accurate interpretation of expected phenotypes or those that may arise unexpectedly. In GEM developed to study specific components of the immune system, accurate evaluation of immune responses must take into consideration not only the gene of interest but also how the background strain and microbial milieu contribute to the manifestation of findings in these mice. This article discusses points to consider regarding immunological differences between the common inbred laboratory mouse strains, particularly in their use as background strains in GEM.Keywords
This publication has 181 references indexed in Scilit:
- The SLAM family member CD48 (Slamf2) protects lupus-prone mice from autoimmune nephritisJournal of Autoimmunity, 2011
- Lysosomal Trafficking, Antigen Presentation, and Microbial Killing Are Controlled by the Arf-like GTPase Arl8bImmunity, 2011
- Molecular aspects of epithelial γδ T cell regulationTrends in Immunology, 2011
- Role of microRNA-155 in autoimmunityCytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 2011
- Anthrax lethal toxin activates the inflammasome in sensitive rat macrophagesBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2010
- Cdcs1 a major colitis susceptibility locus in mice; Subcongenic analysis reveals genetic complexityInflammatory Bowel Diseases, 2010
- Pattern Recognition Receptors and InflammationCell, 2010
- Expression of microRNA‐146 in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissueArthritis & Rheumatism, 2008
- Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cellsNature, 2006
- Epistasis between mouse Klra and major histocompatibility complex class I loci is associated with a new mechanism of natural killer cell–mediated innate resistance to cytomegalovirus infectionNature Genetics, 2005