PATELLAR RESURFACING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Vol. 85 (2), 212-217
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200302000-00005
Abstract
Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is a common complaint and typically is attributed to the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcome of resurfacing and nonresurfacing of the patella, particularly with regard to anterior knee pain, and to clarify the indications for patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty. We performed a prospective, randomized study of 514 consecutive primary press-fit condylar total knee replacements. The patients were randomized to either resurfacing or retention of the patella. They were also randomized to either a cruciate-substituting or a cruciate-retaining prosthesis as part of a separate trial. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to 8.5 years), and the patients were assessed with use of the Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score, and the British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score. The assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced. At the time of follow-up, there were 474 knees. Thirty-five patients who had a bilateral knee replacement underwent resurfacing on one side only. The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 25.1% (fifty-eight of 231 knees) in the nonresurfacing group, compared with 5.3% (thirteen of 243 knees) in the resurfacing group (p < 0.0001). There was one case of component loosening. Ten of eleven patients who underwent secondary resurfacing had complete relief of anterior knee pain. The overall postoperative knee scores were lower in the nonresurfacing group, and the difference was significant among patients with osteoarthritis (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups with regard to the postoperative function score. Patients who had a bilateral knee replacement were more likely to prefer the resurfaced side. As the present study showed a significantly higher rate of anterior knee pain following arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, we recommend patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee replacement when technically possible.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee ArthroplastyJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2000
- Should the patella be resurfaced during total knee replacement?The Knee, 2000
- The results at ten years of the Insall-Burstein II total knee replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1999
- Kinematic total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999
- Patellofemoral complications with the insall-burstein II posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999
- Advantages of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplastyArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 1998
- Comparison of Patellar Resurfacing Versus Nonresurfacing in Bilateral Total Knee ArthroplastyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1990
- Patellar resurfacing in total condylar knee arthroplasty: Technique and resultsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1990
- Patellofemoral functional results and complications with the posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesisThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1988
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1957