Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
Open Access
- 27 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 10 (1), 221
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-221
Abstract
Background: The A/H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic revealed that operational issues of school closure interventions, such as when school closure should be initiated (activation trigger), how long schools should be closed (duration) and what type of school closure should be adopted, varied greatly between and within countries. Computer simulation can be used to examine school closure intervention strategies in order to inform public health authorities as they refine school closure guidelines in light of experience with the A/H1N1 2009 pandemic. Methods: An individual-based simulation model was used to investigate the effectiveness of school closure interventions for influenza pandemics with R0 of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5. The effectiveness of individual school closure and simultaneous school closure were analyzed for 2, 4 and 8 weeks closure duration, with a daily diagnosed case based intervention activation trigger scheme. The effectiveness of combining antiviral drug treatment and household prophyaxis with school closure was also investigated. Results: Illness attack rate was reduced from 33% to 19% (14% reduction in overall attack rate) by 8 weeks school closure activating at 30 daily diagnosed cases in the community for an influenza pandemic with R0 = 1.5; when combined with antivirals a 19% (from 33% to 14%) reduction in attack rate was obtained. For R0 >= 2.0, school closure would be less effective. An 8 weeks school closure strategy gives 9% (from 50% to 41%) and 4% (from 59% to 55%) reduction in attack rate for R0 = 2.0 and 2.5 respectively; however, school closure plus antivirals would give a significant reduction (~15%) in over all attack rate. The results also suggest that an individual school closure strategy would be more effective than simultaneous school closure. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the particular school closure strategy to be adopted depends both on the disease severity, which will determine the duration of school closure deemed acceptable, and its transmissibility. For epidemics with a low transmissibility (R0 < 2.0) and/or mild severity, individual school closures should begin once a daily community case count is exceeded. For a severe, highly transmissible epidemic (R0 >= 2.0), long duration school closure should begin as soon as possible and be combined with other interventions.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- How necessary is a fast testkit for mitigation of pandemic flu?Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2009
- Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic with pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccinesJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2009
- Pandemic Potential of a Strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early FindingsScience, 2009
- Modeling targeted layered containment of an influenza pandemic in the United StatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Time Lines of Infection and Disease in Human Influenza: A Review of Volunteer Challenge StudiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Antiviral treatment for the control of pandemic influenza: some logistical constraintsJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2007
- Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemicNature, 2006
- Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United StatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Design and Evaluation of Prophylactic Interventions Using Infectious Disease Incidence Data from Close Contact GroupsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2006
- A mathematical model for the global spread of influenzaMathematical Biosciences, 1985