Innocent seducer or innocently seduced? the role of the child incest victim
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
- Vol. 11 (1), 56-60
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15374418209533063
Abstract
Incest victims have frequently been held responsible for their victimization. Using the reported passivity of the victims during the incest relationship, the rationalizations of incest offenders, the pre‐incest promiscuity occasionally reported in the victims'as well as the victims’ behavior in therapy, researchers have frequently concluded that the child encouraged, seduced, or otherwise brought on the victimization. This paper focuses on the familial context of incest and how that context contributes to the alleged seductiveness of the child. When that context is fully appreciated, the culpability of the child diminishes.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Family Dynamics of Incest: A New PerspectiveSocial Casework, 1980
- Father-Daughter IncestSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1977
- Children Who Are Victims of Sexual Assault and the Psychology of OffendersAmerican Journal of Psychotherapy, 1976
- Incest: A Synthesis of DataCanadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1972
- Drinking and Deviance Disavowal: The Case of Child MolestersSocial Problems, 1968
- Psychodynamics of Father Daughter IncestCanadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1962
- A study of girl sex victimsPsychiatric Quarterly, 1955
- A follow-up report on children who had atypical sexual experience.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1952
- The reaction of children to sexual relations with adults.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1937