People’s attitude toward xenotransplantation: affective reactions and the influence of the evaluation context
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Xenotransplantation
- Vol. 16 (3), 129-134
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00523.x
Abstract
Background: One of the major issues in transplantation is to find a strategy to overcome the scarcity of human organs. One of the interventions under investigation is represented by xenotransplantation. The present study aimed to understand the role of psychological factors on people’s perception of xenotransplantation. In particular, we tested a condition in which different alternatives (e.g., human vs. pig donors) are presented together allowing people to compare among them (joint evaluation) and two conditions in which people are presented with only one of the two alternatives and cannot compare them (separate evaluation). Methods: The study was conducted with three different groups of participants: patients waiting for liver transplantation (N = 31 in joint evaluation and N = 30 in each of the two separate evaluation conditions); students (N = 30 in join evaluation and N = 30 in each of the two separate evaluation conditions); and healthy adults (N = 30 in joint evaluation and N = 30 in each of the two separate evaluation conditions). Participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios and asked how good (or bad) were their feelings toward one or two types of donor (e.g., human and pig). Results: Patients showed a skeptical attitude toward xenotransplantation both when it was evaluated together with the human donor (P < 0.01) or when it was evaluated separately (P < 0.01). Differently, when asked to evaluate each donor separately healthy adults and students showed similar affective reactions toward the two alternatives (human organ and xenograft). Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that the evaluation context may increase the impact of affective reactions and reduce healthy people’s ability to use information on the potential benefit of a novel biomedical technology. Regardless of the evaluation context, patients always rely on affective reactions and show an overall preference for the human organKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strengthening acceptance for xenotransplantation: the case of attraction effectXenotransplantation, 2008
- Xenotransplantation: current status and a perspective on the futureNature Reviews Immunology, 2007
- Pig–to–Non-human Primate Heart Transplantation: Immunologic Progress Over 20 YearsThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2007
- The potential of statins in xenotransplantationXenotransplantation, 2007
- Embryonic stem cell transplantation: potential applicability in cell replacement therapy and regenerative medicineFrontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2007
- Should donors and recipients be matched in liver transplantation?Journal of Hepatology, 2006
- Understanding of and attitude to xenotransplantation among Italian university students: impact of a 3‐yr university courseXenotransplantation, 2006
- Xenotransplantation: a bioethical evaluationJournal of Medical Ethics, 2006
- Attitudes of Swedes to marginal donors and xenotransplantationJournal of Medical Ethics, 2003
- The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of AlternativesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996