Abstract
A comparison was made between the He dilution technique and body plethysmography, using mouth pressure and esophageal pressure against box pressure, for measuring functional residual capacity (FRC). In patients with restrictive lung disease (n = 9) no major differences in FRC were noted between the techniques. In patients with obstructive lung disease (n = 17), He dilution underestimated FRC by a mean of 0.9 l and conventional body plethysmography (mouth-box pressure) overestimated it by 0.4 l in comparison with FRC obtained by esophageal pressure against box pressure. The difference between the techniques increased with increasing lung volumes. Conventional body plethysmography measures FRC more accurately than the He dilution technique in patients with obstructive lung disease.