Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (caas ii)
- 25 October 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
- Vol. 30 (2), 104-114
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810300205
Abstract
Computer‐assisted contour detection and videodensitometric cross sectional area assessment of coronary artery obstructions on the CAAS II system were validated in vitro and in vivo by angiographic cinefilm recording and automated measurement of stenosis phantoms (luminal diameter 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.4, 1.9 mm) which were first inserted in a plexiglass model and then serially implanted in swine coronary arteries. “Obstruction diameter” (OD) and “obstruction area” (OA) values obtained from 10 in vitro and 19 in vivo images at the site of the artificial stenoses were compared with the true phantom dimensions. The in vitro assessment of OD yielded an accuracy of 0.00±0.11 mm (correlation coefficient: r = 0.98, y = 0.18 + 0.82x, standard error of estimate: SEE = 0.08), whereas the in vivo measurement of OD gave an accuracy of −0.01 ± 0.18 mm (r = 0.94, y = 0.22 + 0.82x, SEE = 0.15). The assessment of OA gave an accuracy of −0.08 ± 0.21 mm2 in vitro (r = 0.97, y = 0.08 + 0.99x, SEE = 0.22) and −0.22 ± 0.32 mm2 in vivo (r = 0.95, y = 0.21 + 1.01x, SEE = 0.33). The mean reproducibility was ±0.09 mm for geometric measurements and ±0.21 mm2 for videodensitometric assessments, respectively. Thus, due to inherent limitations of the imaging chain, the reliability of geometric coronary measurements is still far superior to videodensitometric assessments of vessel cross sectional areas. © 1993 Wiiey‐Liss, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement softwareAmerican Heart Journal, 1993
- Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Comparison of coronary stenosis quantitation results from on-line digital and digitized cine film imagesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Cinevideodensitometric analysis of the effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary stenotic dimensionsAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.Circulation, 1985
- Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: Diameter versus densitometric area measurementsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Coronary angiographic examination with the dynamic spatial reconstructor.Circulation, 1984
- Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms.Circulation, 1984
- Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.Circulation, 1977