Aerosol Generating Procedures and Risk of Transmission of Acute Respiratory Infections to Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (4), e35797
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035797
Abstract
Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) may expose health care workers (HCWs) to pathogens causing acute respiratory infections (ARIs), but the risk of transmission of ARIs from AGPs is not fully known. We sought to determine the clinical evidence for the risk of transmission of ARIs to HCWs caring for patients undergoing AGPs compared with the risk of transmission to HCWs caring for patients not undergoing AGPs. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, University of York CRD databases, EuroScan, LILACS, Indian Medlars, Index Medicus for SE Asia, international health technology agencies and the Internet in all languages for articles from 01/01/1990 to 22/10/2010. Independent reviewers screened abstracts using pre-defined criteria, obtained full-text articles, selected relevant studies, and abstracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The outcome of interest was risk of ARI transmission. The quality of evidence was rated using the GRADE system. We identified 5 case-control and 5 retrospective cohort studies which evaluated transmission of SARS to HCWs. Procedures reported to present an increased risk of transmission included [n; pooled OR(95%CI)] tracheal intubation [n = 4 cohort; 6.6 (2.3, 18.9), and n = 4 case-control; 6.6 (4.1, 10.6)], non-invasive ventilation [n = 2 cohort; OR 3.1(1.4, 6.8)], tracheotomy [n = 1 case-control; 4.2 (1.5, 11.5)] and manual ventilation before intubation [n = 1 cohort; OR 2.8 (1.3, 6.4)]. Other intubation associated procedures, endotracheal aspiration, suction of body fluids, bronchoscopy, nebulizer treatment, administration of O2, high flow O2, manipulation of O2 mask or BiPAP mask, defibrillation, chest compressions, insertion of nasogastric tube, and collection of sputum were not significant. Our findings suggest that some procedures potentially capable of generating aerosols have been associated with increased risk of SARS transmission to HCWs or were a risk factor for transmission, with the most consistent association across multiple studies identified with tracheal intubation.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and CoronavirusInfectious Disease Clinics of North America, 2010
- Lessons learned: Protection of healthcare workers from infectious disease risksCritical Care Medicine, 2010
- Control of influenza in healthcare settings: early lessons from the 2009 pandemicCurrent Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Risk Factors for SARS Transmission from Patients Requiring Intubation: A Multicentre Investigation in Toronto, CanadaPLOS ONE, 2010
- Risk factors for SARS infection among hospital healthcare workers in Beijing: a case control studyTropical Medicine & International Health, 2009
- A review of the risks and disease transmission associated with aerosol generating medical proceduresJournal of Infection Prevention, 2009
- Which preventive measures might protect health care workers from SARS?BMC Public Health, 2009
- 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care SettingsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- Protecting health care workers from SARS and other respiratory pathogens: Organizational and individual factors that affect adherence to infection control guidelinesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2005
- Protecting health care workers from SARS and other respiratory pathogens: A review of the infection control literatureAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2005