Active versus Passive Programming: A Critique of IEP Objectives for Students with the Most Severe Disabilities
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps
- Vol. 13 (3), 197-201
- https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698801300310
Abstract
Students who have severe to profound mental retardation, sensory impairments, medical problems, and severe physical disabilities are often the recipients of passive programming and instruction. These students typically are individuals who have difficulty manipulating their physical and social environments and communicating their intent. This study investigated the quality of programming for students with the most severe disabilities to determine whether physical disabilities that prevent voluntary movement is a discriminating factor affecting the type of programming (i.e., active or passive). The IEPs of 35 students with severe multiple disabilities from six states were evaluated to determine the number of age-inappropriate and nonfunctional objectives, criterion-referenced objectives, and passive versus active objectives. Students were grouped according to their ability to manipulate their physical environment. Findings from this preliminary investigation suggest that both groups of students engage in a considerable number of age-inappropriate and nonfunctional objectives, and that students with very little voluntary movement received more passive instruction than students who were more physically able.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Functional Utility and Effectiveness of Classroom Services for Students with Profound Multiple HandicapsJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1986
- The Quality of IEP Objectives Associated with Placement on Integrated versus Segregated School SitesJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1986
- Concepts and Issues Related to Choice-Making and Autonomy among Persons with Severe DisabilitiesJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1985
- Where Are the Generalized Outcomes? (An Examination of Instructional Objectives)Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1984
- The Importance of Choice-Making Skills for Students with Severe DisabilitiesJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1984
- The Effect of Functional vs. Non-Functional Activities on Attitudes/Expectations of Non-Handicapped College Students: What They See is What We GetJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1984
- A Strategy for Developing Chronological-Age-Appropriate and Functional Curricular Content for Severely Handicapped Adolescents and Young AdultsThe Journal of Special Education, 1979