METHODS USED IN THE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL COMPETENCY OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION RESIDENTS

Abstract

A 17-item questionnaire was designed to determine how physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) training directors assess their residents' clinical competency. A response rate of 83% (62/75) was obtained. Seventy-nine percent (49/62) have a written resident supervision policy, and 73% (45/62) have a written resident probation policy. Ninety-four percent (58/62) believe that their system of evaluating residents' clinical competency is effective, although many commented that it could be improved. 76% (47/62) of the residency training directors made the final decision regarding residents' clinical competency. Fifty-two percent (32/62) have a departmental written examination, and 23% (14/62) have formal oral examinations. Eighteen percent (11/62) use an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), 8% (5/62) use standardized patients and 3% (2/62) use videotaped patient encounters. Forty percent (25/62) use medical record audits. Fifty percent of the programs have rated at least one resident unsatisfactory during a clinical rotation in the past 3 yr, and 11% (7/62) have reported to the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation that the overall clinical evaluation of one resident was unsatisfactory in the past 3 yr. Forty-seven percent (29/62) of the programs have asked at least one resident to leave their program in the past 3 yr. The OSCE is emerging as the state-of-the-art method for assessing clinical skills, although it is expensive. The measurement of clinical competency is important in the certification and recertification process, and our specialty needs better methods to assess these performance skills.