Chromium in Drinking Water: Sources, Metabolism, and Cancer Risks
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 July 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Vol. 24 (10), 1617-1629
- https://doi.org/10.1021/tx200251t
Abstract
Drinking water supplies in many geographic areas contain chromium in the +3 and +6 oxidation states. Public health concerns are centered on the presence of hexavalent Cr that is classified as a known human carcinogen via inhalation. Cr(VI) has high environmental mobility and can originate from anthropogenic and natural sources. Acidic environments with high organic content promote the reduction of Cr(VI) to nontoxic Cr(III). The opposite process of Cr(VI) formation from Cr(III) also occurs, particularly in the presence of common minerals containing Mn(IV) oxides. Limited epidemiological evidence for Cr(VI) ingestion is suggestive of elevated risks for stomach cancers. Exposure of animals to Cr(VI) in drinking water induced tumors in the alimentary tract, with linear and supralinear responses in the mouse small intestine. Chromate, the predominant form of Cr(VI) at neutral pH, is taken up by all cells through sulfate channels and is activated nonenzymatically by ubiquitously present ascorbate and small thiols. The most abundant form of DNA damage induced by Cr(VI) is Cr-DNA adducts, which cause mutations and chromosomal breaks. Emerging evidence points to two-way interactions between DNA damage and epigenetic changes that collectively determine the spectrum of genomic rearrangements and profiles of gene expression in tumors. Extensive formation of DNA adducts, clear positivity in genotoxicity assays with high predictive values for carcinogenicity, the shape of tumor–dose responses in mice, and a biological signature of mutagenic carcinogens (multispecies, multisite, and trans-sex tumorigenic potency) strongly support the importance of the DNA-reactive mutagenic mechanisms in carcinogenic effects of Cr(VI). Bioavailability results and kinetic considerations suggest that 10–20% of ingested low-dose Cr(VI) escapes human gastric inactivation. The directly mutagenic mode of action and the incompleteness of gastric detoxification argue against a threshold in low-dose extrapolation of cancer risk for ingested Cr(VI).Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
This publication has 133 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydroxylation of 5-Methylcytosine by TET1 Promotes Active DNA Demethylation in the Adult BrainCell, 2011
- CREBBP mutations in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemiaNature, 2011
- ATM-Dependent Chromatin Changes Silence Transcription In cis to DNA Double-Strand BreaksCell, 2010
- Chromium genotoxicity: A double-edged swordChemico-Biological Interactions, 2010
- Mechanism of DNA−Protein Cross-Linking by ChromiumChemical Research in Toxicology, 2009
- Modulation of histone methylation and MLH1 gene silencing by hexavalent chromiumToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2009
- Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies of chromium picolinate monohydrate administered in feed to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice for 2 yearsFood and Chemical Toxicology, 2009
- Reduction with Glutathione Is a Weakly Mutagenic Pathway in Chromium(VI) MetabolismChemical Research in Toxicology, 2008
- Synergistic response to oncogenic mutations defines gene class critical to cancer phenotypeNature, 2008
- Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Metal Carcinogenesis and Cocarcinogenesis: Nickel, Arsenic, and ChromiumChemical Research in Toxicology, 2007