Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 26 (8), 1437-1441
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988
Abstract
We initiated a comparative study of four methods of yeast inoculum prepartion: a spectrophotometric method, the Wickerham card method, a hemacytometer method, and the Prompt inoculation system. The variability in inoculum size obtained when each method was applied to two strains each of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Torulopsis glabrata, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae was analyzed in a single laboratory. Each method was performed in triplicate on the same day and on three separate days to provide estimates of within-day and beween-day variations. Inoculum size was determined by viable colony counts. The greatest range of inoculum sizes was seen with the Wickerham card method. Viable counts ranged from 1.1 .times. 106 to 24.2 .times. 106 CFU/ml among the 12 yeast isolates. The greatest variation was observed with the Prompt system. Within-day coefficients of variation averaged 19% (range, 40 to 45%), and between-day coefficients of variation averaged 22% 9 range, 3 to 51%). Variation between laboratories was evaluated by comparing inoculum values obtained by each method in three different laboratories for two strains of C. albicans. The spectrophotometric method was the least variable and the Wickerham card and hemacytometer methods were the most variable methods between laboratories. The spectrophotometric method is recommended as the method of choice for prepartion of a standardized inoculum suspension for susceptibility testing of yeasts.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of the Prompt Inoculation System® in Preparing a Standardized Yeast InoculumAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1987
- Antifungal susceptibility testsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1987
- Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methodsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1987
- Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin BJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1986
- AZOLE RESISTANCE IN CANDIDA-ALBICANS1984
- Correlation of in Vitro Susceptibility Test Results with in Vivo Response: Flucytosine Therapy in a Systemic Candidiasis ModelThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983
- Incidence of polyene-resistant yeasts recovered from clinical specimensAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1980
- Turbidimetric Studies of Growth Inhibition of Yeasts with Three Drugs: Inquiry into Inoculum-Dependent Susceptibility Testing, Time of Onset of Drug Effect, and Implications for Current and Newer MethodsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1978
- Variables Influencing Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-FluorocytosineAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1973