Hippocampal damage equally impairs memory for single items and memory for conjunctions
- 28 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Hippocampus
- Vol. 13 (2), 281-292
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.10085
Abstract
In a prior study of continuous recognition performance, data were reported in support of the hypothesis that the hippocampus is not needed to remember the individual components of a stimulus but is important for remembering associations between its components (Kroll et al. 1996 . J Mem Lang 35:176–196). Patients with left hippocampal damage were able to endorse recently encountered words and to reject novel words, as well as disyllabic words in which one of the syllables had been previously encountered. However, they failed to reject words in which both syllables had been encountered independently in different words. We present data from five experiments designed to examine this finding in more detail. In each experiment, five patients with bilateral hippocampal damage and eight controls were tested using the same protocol as Kroll et al. ( 1996 ). On each trial, a two‐component stimulus was presented. Stimuli could be entirely novel, novel with one previously encountered (repeated) component, novel but with both components repeated, or a true repetition. The first experiment was a direct replication using the same disyllabic words as Kroll et al. ( 1996 ). The second experiment used pseudo‐words, constructed of two monosyllabic words (e.g., jambark). The third experiment used the same pairs of monosyllabic words, but presented separately on the screen to encourage participants to treat each component independently. The fourth experiment used pairs of objects, and the fifth experiment used face–house pairs. In all five experiments, patients with hippocampal damage exhibited impaired recognition memory. The impairment extended across all trial types with no evidence that hippocampal damage selectively (or disproportionately) impaired the associative or conjunctive component of memory. We discuss our findings in the light of the work by Kroll et al. ( 1996 ) and other recent neuropsychological, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging studies of hippocampal function and single‐item and associative memory. Hippocampus 2003;13:281–292.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach.Psychological Review, 2003
- Simple and Associative Recognition Memory in the Hippocampal RegionLearning & Memory, 2001
- Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001
- Recognition memory and familiarity judgments in severe amnesia: No evidence for a contribution of repetition priming.Behavioral Neuroscience, 2000
- Impaired recognition memory on the doors and people test after damage limited to the hippocampal regionHippocampus, 1999
- Differential Effects of Early Hippocampal Pathology on Episodic and Semantic MemoryScience, 1997
- Human hippocampus establishes associations in memoryHippocampus, 1997
- Cohesion Failure as a Source of Memory IllusionsJournal of Memory and Language, 1996
- Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 1985