Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 14 (4), 429-437
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: A tutorialBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may misleadBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Use of Indirect and Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Technology AssessmentPharmacoEconomics, 2008
- Combined resynchronisation and implantable defibrillator therapy in left ventricular dysfunction: Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2007
- Recent developments in meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regressionStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly headStatistics in Medicine, 2002