Pertussis Vaccine: Reasonable Doubt?
- 27 April 1978
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 298 (17), 966-967
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197804272981711
Abstract
Although the massively publicized swine-influenza experience has given Americans a lesson on the fallibility of immunization policy decisions, we have been spared much of another disturbing debate now raging in Europe. Pertussis vaccine, which must be given early in the first year of life if it is to protect during the period when inflammatory airway obstruction would be most threatening, has for some time been under a cloud of suspicion in Britain and on the Continent.1 2 3 4 By contrast, there have been almost no reports of excessive untoward reactions in the United States. Why has the benefit/risk ratio been perceived differently . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHOOPING-COUGH VACCINATIONThe Lancet, 1978
- Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of Hamster Tracheal Organ Cultures Infected with Bordetella pertussisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1977
- The Care of Children — Pertussis Vaccination — Dr. David Owen, Foreign SecretaryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- VACCINATION AGAINST WHOOPING-COUGHThe Lancet, 1977
- WHOOPING-COUGH ADMISSIONS TO A PÆDIATRIC HOSPITAL OVER TEN YEARSThe Lancet, 1977
- USE OF PERTUSSIS VACCINE IN AN EPIDEMIC INVOLVING HOSPITAL STAFFThe Lancet, 1975
- Vaccination Against Whooping-cough: Final Report to the Medical Research CouncilBMJ, 1959