Impact of venography on the diagnosis and management of deep vein thrombosis.
- 26 February 1983
- Vol. 286 (6366), 698-699
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.286.6366.698
Abstract
In general medical patients presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis routine use of x ray venography was associated with a large fall in the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, from 83% to 25% (p less than 0.001), and with an appreciable shortening of hospital stay, from 13.6 to 7.2 days. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was rejected in only 4% of patients when a venogram was not performed, and it is estimated that two patients were treated with anticoagulants unnecessarily for every patient treated correctly. The risk, expense, and inconvenience of unnecessary anticoagulant treatment far exceeds the risk, expense, and inconvenience of performing venograms routinely. The common practice of misdiagnosing deep vein thrombosis clinically should be abandoned.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combined phlebography and arthrography in patients with painful swollen calf.BMJ, 1981
- Use of Levamisole in Recurrent Aphthous StomatitisDrugs, 1980
- PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THROMBOPHLEBITIS AND "PSEUDOTHROMBOPHLEBITIS"The Lancet, 1980
- DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS IN THE OUTPATIENT BY VENOGRAPHY1980
- A 7-year analysis of haemorrhage in patients on long-term anticoagulant treatment.Heart, 1979
- The origin of thrombi in the deep veins of the lower limb: A venographic studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1978
- DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSISBritish Medical Bulletin, 1978
- Combined Use of Leg Scanning and Impedance Plethysmography in Suspected Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- William Grey Walter.1977
- The Diagnosis of Deep Venous ThrombosisArchives of Surgery, 1976