Surgical or Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 32 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d
Abstract
A randomized controlled trial. To assess the effectiveness of decompressive surgery as compared with nonoperative measures in the treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. No previous randomized trial has assessed the effectiveness of surgery in comparison with conservative treatment for spinal stenosis. Four university hospitals agreed on the classification of the disease, inclusion and exclusion criteria, radiographic routines, surgical principles, nonoperative treatment options, and follow-up protocols. A total of 94 patients were randomized into a surgical or nonoperative treatment group: 50 and 44 patients, respectively. Surgery comprised undercutting laminectomy of the stenotic segments in 10 patients augmented with transpedicular fusion. The primary outcome was based on assessment of functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (scale, 0–100). Data on the intensity of leg and back pain (scales, 0–10), as well as self-reported and measured walking ability were compiled at randomization and at follow-up examinations at 6, 12, and 24 months. Both treatment groups showed improvement during follow-up. At 1 year, the mean difference in favor of surgery was 11.3 in disability (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–18.4), 1.7 in leg pain (95% CI, 0.4–3.0), and 2.3(95% CI, 1.1–3.6) in back pain. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean differences were slightly less: 7.8 in disability (95% CI, 0.8–14.9) 1.5 in leg pain (95% CI, 0.3–2.8), and 2.1 in back pain (95% CI, 1.0–3.3). Walking ability, either reported or measured, did not differ between the two treatment groups. Although patients improved over the 2-year follow-up regardless of initial treatment, those undergoing decompressive surgery reported greater improvement regarding leg pain, back pain, and overall disability. The relative benefit of initial surgical treatment diminished over time, but outcomes of surgery remained favorable at 2 years. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these differences persist.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 8 to 10 Year Results from the Maine Lumbar Spine StudySpine, 2005
- Examination Findings and Self-Reported Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal StenosisPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2001
- Decompressive Surgery for Typical Lumbar Spinal StenosisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- Imaging Lumbar Spinal StenosisRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2001
- A long-term (4- to 12-year) follow-up study of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosisEuropean Spine Journal, 2000
- Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 2000
- Surgical Outcome of 438 Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 1997
- Seven- to 10-year Outcome of Decompressive Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 1996
- Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1992
- Inference and missing dataBiometrika, 1976