Input and Output Variables in the Recall of Categorized and Uncategorized Lists
- 1 July 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of General Psychology
- Vol. 89 (1), 109-114
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1973.9710823
Abstract
A list of 25 nouns containing five sets of five words each beginning with a different initial letter was presented for five learning trials. The words were presented either randomly or were blockd on the basis of the initial letter. For half the Ss, the list contained five categories of five words each. For the second half of the Ss the words were unrelated. Recall was either free or cued. Categorized lists were recalled better than uncategorized lists and free recall was better than cued recall. It was concluded that under certain conditions cued recall hinders performance by interfering with the subjective-organization an S imposes on the list.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cued recall and free recall as a function of the number of items per cue.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1972
- Organization, retroactive inhibition, and free-recall learningJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970
- Storage and retrieval cues in free recall learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Retroactive inhibition in free-recall learning with alphabetical cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- Cued recall and free recall as a function of the number of items per cueJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967
- The effect of alphabetical subjective organization on memorizing unrelated words.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1962