A Conceptual Model for Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication in Public Health
- 1 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Health Security
- Vol. 16 (3), 193-203
- https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2018.0020
Abstract
Public health threats, such as emerging infectious diseases, terrorism, environmental catastrophes, and natural disasters, all require effective communication. Emergency risk communication is a critical component of public health emergency planning and response. It is a complex process involving a variety of constructs that interact in dynamic ways over time. While emergency risk communication is generally recognized as an important tool for risk management and emergency response, the specific elements, processes, and outcomes are not well described and have not been systematically assessed. In this article, we describe a conceptual model for public health developed in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We propose using this model to inform practice and to guide evaluations of emergency risk communication. The model was informed by an extensive review of the emergency risk communication literature, interviews with researchers, and discussions with CDC stakeholders. This model can be adapted for a wide range of emergency events and incorporates key constructs to assess internal processes, as well as outcomes of emergency risk communication on audiences. Evaluating internal processes can help identify and correct messaging deficiencies. Outcome constructs describe expected target audience responses to emergency risk communication, such as changes in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that may occur over time. This can help public health communicators learn how their various activities contribute to emergency risk communication outcomes. The authors describe a conceptual model for public health emergency risk communication developed in collaboration with the CDC. The model was informed by an extensive review of the emergency risk communication literature, interviews with researchers, and discussions with CDC stakeholders. It can be adapted for a wide range of emergency events and incorporates key constructs to assess internal processes, as well as outcomes of emergency risk communication on audiences.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring risk attenuation and crisis communication after a plague death in Grand CanyonJournal of Risk Research, 2013
- When the facts are just not enough: Credibly communicating about risk is riskier when emotions run high and time is shortToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2011
- Disasters, Lessons Learned, and Fantasy DocumentsJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2009
- Communicating With the Public About Emerging Health Threats: Lessons From the Pre-Event Message Development ProjectAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Critical Asset and Portfolio Risk Analysis: An All‐Hazards FrameworkRisk Analysis, 2007
- Emergency Communication Challenges in Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons from the Centers for Disease Control and PreventionJournal of Applied Communication Research, 2007
- Best Practices in Crisis Communication: An Expert Panel ProcessJournal of Applied Communication Research, 2006
- Defining Moments in Risk Communication Research: 1996–2005Journal of Health Communication, 2006
- Information Processing and Risk Perception: An Adaptation of the Heuristic-Systematic ModelJournal of Communication, 2002
- The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual FrameworkRisk Analysis, 1988