Performance of the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay for quantification of HIV-1 clades prevalent in China
- 30 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Virology
- Vol. 41 (4), 305-309
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2008.01.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of HIV-1 genetic diversity in China on the measurement of viral loadJournal of Medical Virology, 2007
- Evaluation of performance across the dynamic range of the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay as compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 using serial dilutions of 39 group M and O virusesJournal of Virological Methods, 2007
- Performance of the automated Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay on a genetically diverse panel of specimens from London: Comparison to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5, and LCx® HIV RNA Quantitative assaysJournal of Virological Methods, 2006
- Performance of the automated Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay on a genetically diverse panel of specimens from BrazilJournal of Virological Methods, 2006
- Comparative Evaluation of the Performance of the Abbott Real-Time Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Assay for Measurement of HIV-1 Plasma Viral Load following Automated Specimen PreparationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Genetic Diversity on Performance of Four Commercial Viral Load Assays: LCx HIV RNA Quantitative, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5, VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0, and NucliSens HIV-1 QTJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Multicenter evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay for the quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasmaJournal of Virological Methods, 2005
- Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in HIV-1-infected individuals in South AfricaJournal of Virological Methods, 2005
- Characteristics and Applications of Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification (NASBA)Molecular Biotechnology, 2002
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986