Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using two different schedules
Open Access
- 10 November 2003
- Vol. 98 (12), 2664-2670
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11869
Abstract
BACKGROUND New therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Various gemcitabine‐oxaliplatin combinations have been tested recently in patients with ovarian and pancreatic carcinoma, yielding interesting results with little toxicity. Therefore, the authors evaluated the activity and toxicity of two such combinations in patients with HCC. METHODS Twenty‐one patients were enrolled prospectively in the study. Eleven patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on Day 2 (GEMOX‐1), and 10 patients received gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on Day 1 followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on Day 1 (GEMOX‐2). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression developed or until unacceptable adverse effects occurred. RESULTS All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Four patients (19%) achieved objective responses (95% confidence interval, 13–26%), including 3 patients in the GEMOX‐1 group and 1 patient in the GEMOX‐2 group. Ten patients (48%) had stable disease, and 7 patients (33%) experienced disease progression. The median progression‐free survival was 5 months, and the median overall survival was 12 months. Fifty‐four percent of patients in the GEMOX‐1 group and 50% of patients in the GEMOX‐2 group had received previous systemic chemotherapy or cisplatin‐based chemoembolization. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity, according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, consisted of thrombocytopenia (GEMOX‐1 vs. GEMOX‐2, 18% vs. 40%) and neutropenia (0% vs. 30%). No Grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed, except for 1 episode of Grade 3 diarrhea. Grade 1 neurotoxicity and Grade 2 neurotoxicity (specific scale), respectively, were observed in 4 patients and 7 patients receiving GEMOX‐1 and in 7 patients and 1 patient receiving GEMOX‐2. CONCLUSIONS Gemcitabine‐oxaliplatin combination therapy is feasible in patients with advanced HCC. The GEMOX‐1 regimen was tolerated better than the GEMOX‐2 regimen. Currently, the GEMOX‐1 regimen is being evaluated in a Phase II study in previously untreated patients with HCC. Cancer 2003;98:2664–70. © 2003 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Gemcitabine Combined With Oxaliplatin in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Final Results of a GERCOR Multicenter Phase II StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Clinical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL ConferenceJournal of Hepatology, 2001
- Expression of P-Glycoprotein in Hepatocellular CarcinomaAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- A multi-centre randomized phase II study of nolatrexed versus doxorubicin in treatment of Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinomaCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1999
- Supraadditive effect of 2 ′ ,2 ′ -difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) in combination with oxaliplatin in human cancer cell linesCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1999
- Transarterial embolization versus symptomatic treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of a randomized, controlled trial in a single institutionHepatology, 1998
- Review article: overview of medical treatments in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma—an impossible meta‐analysis?Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1998
- A Comparison of Lipiodol Chemoembolization and Conservative Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995