Open and Percutaneous Paracentesis and Lavage for Abdominal Trauma
- 1 March 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 116 (3), 318-319
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380150046012
Abstract
• To compare the accuracy and safety of open abdominal paracentesis and lavage vs percutaneous paracentesis and lavage, 210 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized into two groups of 105 each. There were no false-negative diagnoses in either group. The accuracy rate for the open method was 98.1%, and 91.4% for the percutaneous method. Six major complications were encountered with the percutaneous method, for a complication rate of 5.7% compared with no major complications with the open method. The results suggest that the open technique is superior to the percutaneous method. (Arch Surg 1981;116:318-319)This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- EVALUATION OF PERITONEAL LAVAGE AND LOCAL EXPLORATION IN LOWER CHEST AND ABDOMINAL STAB WOUNDSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1977
- DIAGNOSTIC PERITONEAL LAVAGE IN PEDIATRIC TRAUMAPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1976
- Technic for peritoneal dialysis and diagnostic peritoneal lavageThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal traumaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1973
- Is Peritoneal Lavage for the Diagnosis of Hemoperitoneum Safe?Archives of Surgery, 1971
- PERFORATING INJURIES OF THE BOWEL COMPLICATING PERITONEAL CATHETER INSERTIONThe Lancet, 1968