Hospital-acquired pneumonia: coverage and treatment adequacy of current guidelines

Abstract

The American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) released in 1996 and the Trouillet classification published in 1998 supply different rational foundations for the classification of patients with HAP and for the selection of initial antibiotic therapy. The aims of this study were to assess the level of bacterial coverage and to assess and validate the adequacy of antibiotic strategy of each of these classifications.Intensive care unit-admitted patients (n=71) with suspicion of HAP were evaluated. The ATS and Trouillet classifications demonstrated an accuracy to predict the causative microorganism of 91% and 83%, respectively. The ATS and Trouillet antibiotic treatment recommendations were adequate in 79% and 80% of the patients, respectively. The microorganisms implicated in the treatment inadequacy of the ATS guideline werePseudomonas aeruginosa(n=3),Acinetobacter baumanii(n=1),Stenotrophomonas maltophilia(n=1) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(n=1).P. aeruginosawas implicated with Trouillet treatment inadequacy.The current recommendations for empirical antibiotic treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (American Thoracic Society and Trouillet) showed a good ability to predict the involved pathogen. However, considering the resistance pattern of the isolated pathogens, both classifications demonstrated a rather lower treatment adequacy; the main reason was the failure to treat highly resistant strains.