Tobacco industry statements in the US Department of Justice lawsuit
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 12 (1), 94-101
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.1.94
Abstract
A test of whether the industry has reformed is the truthfulness of company statements made under penalty of sanction in a court of law. At the request of Rep. Henry A Waxman, this report examines recently submitted filings by the five largest cigarette manufacturers in the civil suit brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ). The report assesses the truthfulness of company positions on three critical health issues: (1) the health effects of smoking; (2) the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke; and (3) the addictiveness of nicotine. The report also examines three companies’ statements about previously controversial issues: Philip Morris’s statements on control of nicotine, RJ Reynolds’s statements on marketing to children, and British American Tobacco’s statements on document destruction.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Master Settlement Agreement with the Tobacco Industry and Cigarette Advertising in MagazinesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracyBMJ, 2000
- Blowing smoke: how cigarette manufacturers argued that nicotine is not addictiveTobacco Control, 1999
- Brand logo recognition by children aged 3 to 6 years. Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel.1991
- RJR Nabisco's cartoon camel promotes camel cigarettes to children.1991