A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 177 (3), 250-256
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00017-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic or open appendectomy?Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: Results of a prospective randomized studySurgery, 1996
- Laparoscopic Versus Open AppendectomySouthern Medical Journal, 1996
- Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy A Prospective Randomized ComparisonAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic AppendectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-AnalysisJournal of Educational Statistics, 1983
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979