Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Urology
- Vol. 18 (1), 71-77
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e3282f19d01
Abstract
Purpose of review The purpose of this article is to review the current status of advanced MRI techniques based on anatomic, metabolic and physiologic properties of prostate cancer with a focus on their impact in managing prostate cancer patients. Recent findings Prostate cancer can be identified based on reduced T2 signal intensity on MRI, increased choline and decreased citrate and polyamines on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), decreased diffusivity on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and increased uptake on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging. All can be obtained within a 60-min 3T magnetic resonance exam. Each complementary method has inherent advantages and disadvantages: T2 MRI has high sensitivity but poor specificity; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging has high specificity but poor sensitivity; diffusion tensor imaging has high spatial resolution, is the fastest, but sensitivity/specificity needs to be established; dynamic contrast enhanced imaging has high spatial resolution, but requires a gadolinium based contrast agent injection, and sensitivity/specificity needs to be established. Summary The best characterization of prostate cancer in individual patients will most likely result from a multiparametric (MRI/MRSI/DTI/DCE) exam using 3T magnetic resonance scanners but questions remain as to how to analyze and display this large amount of imaging data, and how to optimally combine the data for the most accurate assessment of prostate cancer. Histological correlations or clinical outcomes are required to determine sensitivity/specificity for each method and optimal combinations of these approaches.Keywords
This publication has 89 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of prostate-specific antigen as a tumour marker in men with prostate cancer managed by watchful-waiting: correlation with findings at serial endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imagingBJU International, 2007
- Incremental Value of Multiplanar Cross-Referencing for Prostate Cancer Staging with Endorectal MRIAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2007
- Clinical role of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in oncology: brain, breast, and prostate cancerThe Lancet Oncology, 2006
- Preoperative Nomogram Predicting the 10-Year Probability of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical ProstatectomyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor rangeMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2006
- Localization of Prostate Cancer Using 3T MRIJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2006
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancerThe Prostate, 2004
- Structural, Functional, and Molecular MR Imaging of the MicrovasculatureAnnual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2003
- ERA SPECIFIC BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996