The case of the missing 6 dB
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 71 (3), 650-659
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387540
Abstract
[Human] subjects (15) participated in 8 experimental comparisons using 3-9 subjects each, with sufficient replications so that most subjects'' MAP/MAF [minimum audible pressure (earphone) minimum audible field (loudspeaker)] and/or loudness differences were determined within 1 or 2 dB at the 95% confidence level. Previous results were replicated using previous methods, but with these modified methods, the average difference across experiments was < 0.2 dB, and no subject in any experiment exhibited more than a 1.8-dB difference averaged across trials. The case of the missing 6 dB should be considered closed.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: Where is the ’’missing 6 dB’’?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- In Search of the Missing 6 DbThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1952