Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence
- 27 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 107 (2), 97-105
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2001
- Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect.Psychological Review, 2000
- Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You AskOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- Judgments of Decision Effectiveness: Actor-Observer Differences in OverconfidenceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- The Hard–Easy Effect in Subjective Probability CalibrationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- The Distortion of Information during DecisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Determinants of Overconfidence and Miscalibration: The Roles of Random Error and Ecological StructureOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- A model of calibration for subjective probabilitiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980
- Overconfidence in case-study judgments.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965