Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 17 (12), 1731-1736
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199917120-00010
Abstract
To assess inter-observer agreement in the interpretation of renal angiograms. Comparison of the assessment of renal angiograms by three experienced radiologists, who evaluated the number of renal arteries and the presence, location, aspect and severity of a renal artery stenosis. General hospital and university hospital serving urban and rural populations. Patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension referred for diagnostic work-up; 312 angiograms with the intra-arterial digital subtraction technique were obtained from 289 consecutive patients. Inter-observer agreement was tested for the following parameters: number of arteries per kidney, presence of stenosis, location of stenosis (truncal, ostial), aspect of stenosis (concentric, eccentric, post-stenotic dilatation), severity of stenosis (reduction of lumen diameter in categories of 30%, 40%, etc. to 100%), and overall quality of the angiographic images. Kappa (kappa) values and weighted kappa between the three pairs of radiologists were used as estimates of inter-observer agreement Agreement about the number of renal arteries was reasonable (kappa = 0.50-0.72), as was agreement about the presence of stenosis (kappa = 0.68-0.86). Agreement about stenosis location and aspect was poor (kappa = 0.26-0.47 and kappa = 0.15-0.26, respectively). There was general agreement about the severity of stenosis (weighted kappa = 0.65-0.70), but it was not possible to distinguish between 50 and 60% stenosis or between 60 and 70% stenosis (kappa < 0.40). No correlation was found between agreement on severity of stenosis and the quality of the images. It is not realistic to make statements about what degree of renal artery stenosis is clinically significant, as long as the intra-arterial angiogram with digital subtraction remains the gold standard. It is likewise risky to rely too strongly on stenosis morphology as visualized by renal angiography in choosing between balloon angioplasty and stent deployment.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A follow-up study with duplex ultrasonographyJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- A Prospective Study of Disease Progression in Patients With Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis*American Journal of Hypertension, 1996
- Pulmonary embolism: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of conventional angiographic and DSA images in patients with nondiagnostic lung scan results.Radiology, 1996
- Restenosis after a first percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty.Hypertension, 1993
- Natural history of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis associated with aortic diseaseJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1991
- Role of duplex scanning for the detection of atherosclerotic renal artery diseaseKidney International, 1991
- Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty in Renovascular Hypertension Due to Atheroma or Fibromuscular DysplasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Reliability of assessing change with sequential coronary angiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Renal artery stenosis: anatomic classification for percutaneous transluminal angioplastyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974