Abstract
Several anaerobic techniques and a number of different media were compared for the isolation of the anaerobic bacteria from chicken and turkey caeca. Under optimal conditions it was possible to isolate more than 25 per cent of the total flora. An analysis was made of the anaerobic bacteria isolated from 5‐week‐old chickens, the organisms being divided into groups based on morphological and some physiological criteria. It was found that the Gram‐negative non‐sporing anaerobes (Bacteroidaceae) and the Gram‐positive non‐sporing rods and bifidobacteria were present in almost equal proportions and formed about 80 per cent of the flora isolated. The rest of the flora consisted mainly of peptostreptococci (15 per cent) together with a number of organisms including curved rods which have not been characterised. So far five distinct groups of Gram‐negative anaerobes (Bacteroidaceae) have been isolated from chickens and turkeys, together with three groups of Gram‐positive non‐sporing rods and bifidobacteria and four groups of peptostreptococci. Typical strains from each group were tested for their ability to grow in a complex nutrient medium (VL) with or without supplements of haemin, menadione or laked blood. Their behaviour in the presence of certain antibiotics and dyes was also tested in order to develop appropriate selective media.

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit: