Health and Economic Benefits of Increased β-Blocker Use Following Myocardial Infarction
- 6 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 284 (21), 2748-2754
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.21.2748
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Health and Economic Benefits of Increased β-Blocker Use Following Myocardial Infarction — Contextβ-Blockers are underused in patients who have myocardial infarction (MI), despite the proven efficacy of these agents. New evidence indicates that β-blockers can have benefit in patients with conditions that have been considered relative contraindications. Understanding the consequences of underuse of β-blockers is important because of the implications for current policy debates over quality-of-care measures and Medicare prescription drug coverage.ObjectiveTo examine the potential health and economic impact of increased use of β-blockers in patients who have had MI.Design and SettingWe used the Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Policy Model, a computer-simulation Markov model of CHD in the US population, to estimate the epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of increased β-blocker use from current to target levels among survivors of MI aged 35 to 84 years. Simulations included 1 cohort of MI survivors in 2000 followed up for 20 years and 20 successive annual cohorts of all first-MI survivors in 2000-2020. Mortality and morbidity from CHD were derived from published meta-analyses and recent studies. This analysis used a societal perspective.Main Outcome MeasuresPrevented MIs, CHD mortality, life-years gained, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in 2000-2020.ResultsInitiating β-blocker use for all MI survivors except those with absolute contraindications in 2000 and continuing treatment for 20 years would result in 4300 fewer CHD deaths, 3500 MIs prevented, and 45,000 life-years gained compared with current use. The incremental cost per QALY gained would be $4500. If this increase in β-blocker use were implemented in all first-MI survivors annually over 20 years, β-blockers would save $18 million and result in 72,000 fewer CHD deaths, 62,000 MIs prevented, and 447,000 life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of β-blocker therapy would always be less than $11,000 per QALY gained, even under unfavorable assumptions, and may even be cost saving. Restricting β-blockers only to ideal patients (those without absolute or relative contraindications) would reduce the epidemiological impact of β-blocker therapy by about 60%.ConclusionsOur simulation indicates that increased use of β-blockers after MI would lead to impressive gains in health and would be potentially cost saving.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Effect of Beta-Blockade on Mortality among High-Risk and Low-Risk Patients after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The recent decline in mortality from coronary heart disease, 1980-1990. The effect of secular trends in risk factors and treatmentPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Adverse outcomes of underuse of beta-blockers in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarctionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Adherence to National Guidelines for Drug Treatment of Suspected Acute Myocardial InfarctionArchives of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Impact and cost-effectiveness of smoking interventionsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Cost and health implications of cholesterol lowering.Circulation, 1992
- Expected gains in life expectancy from various coronary heart disease risk factor modifications.Circulation, 1991
- Long-term impact of smoking cessation on the incidence of coronary heart disease.American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- Relative impact of targeted versus populationwide cholesterol interventions on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Projections of the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model.Circulation, 1989