Politics and the Career Mobility of Bureaucrats
- 1 March 1974
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 68 (1), 18-26
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1959738
Abstract
Career mobility is conceptualized in terms of the amount and bias of organizational, occupational, vertical and geographical movement. An operational measure is offered for the amount of mobility (not the bias) which permits comparative generalizations to be made about officials based on simple sampling procedures. For illustrative purposes, the amount of organizational mobility is measured for two samples of federal officials: David T. Stanley's sample (N = 557) of higher civil servants and a sample (N = 300) of foreign affairs officials. Several dichotomous background variables are included for both samples of officials including: age, rank, and education. Varying background characteristics is found to make only a small mobility difference for higher civil servants and a much greater difference for foreign affairs officials. Several speculations are offered to explain the political significance of the empirical findings, and a comparative typology of career mobility is developed.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and ChoicePublic Administration Review, 1972
- Some Political Implications of the Drift toward a Liberation of Federal EmployeesPublic Administration Review, 1971
- Democracy and the Public Service.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971
- The Generalist and Organizational MobilityPublic Administration Review, 1970
- Bureaucracy, Politics and Public Policy.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969
- Managerial Succession and Organizational EffectivenessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1963
- The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1961
- The Forest RangerSoil Science, 1960
- The Senior Civil Service and the Career SystemPublic Administration Review, 1958
- The People of the State Department and Foreign ServiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1954