Cluster randomized controlled trials
- 12 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 11 (5), 479-483
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00568.x
Abstract
Cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT), in which groups or clusters of individuals rather than individuals themselves are randomized, are increasingly common. Indeed, for the evaluation of certain types of intervention (such as those used in health promotion and educational interventions) a cluster randomized trial is virtually the only valid approach. However, cluster trials are generally more difficult to design and execute than individually randomized studies, and some design features of a cluster trial may make it particularly vulnerable to a range of threats that can introduce bias. In this paper we discuss the issues that can lead to bias in cluster randomized trials and conclude with some suggestions for avoiding these problems.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journalsBMJ, 2003
- Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative carePalliative Medicine, 2002
- Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer?BMJ, 2001
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Subverting Randomization in Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1995
- Subverting randomization in controlled trialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Randomised consent designs in cancer clinical trialsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journalsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: An updateStatistics in Medicine, 1990