Construct Validity of Medicare Chemotherapy Claims
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 40 (3), 201-211
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200203000-00004
Abstract
The elderly are under represented in clinical trials of cancer therapy and the elderly who are enrolled may be unrepresentative. To assess whether Medicare claims data might be used to understand the benefits and tolerance of chemotherapy in the general elderly population, the construct validity of Medicare 5FU claims for elderly colon cancer patients within the SEER-Medicare data set was determined. In this validation study of Medicare chemotherapy claims from the linked the SEER-Medicare data set, the patterns of 5FU chemotherapy claims were evaluated for an incident cohort of elderly colon cancer patients (n = 15,039) during the 13 months following their diagnosis. Patterns of Medicare National Claims History (NCH) 5FU claims were evaluated with respect to prespecified patient-level disease and demographic factors from the data set. Twenty-two percent of patients had at least one detectable 5FU claim during the observation period. Among those patients, the median dose of 5FU was 1000 mg, the median interval between 5FU claims was 7 days, and the median number of claims during this period was 24. Multivariate regression revealed expected associations between demographic and disease factors and the likelihood of having a Medicare NCH 5FU claim. With increasing cancer stage, patients' likelihood of having a 5FU claim increased. Younger patients, married patients, white patients, patients with low comorbidity, and patients living in urban and less impoverished regions were each more likely to have 5FU claims. Because their pattern is consistent with the standard of medical care and with previously described associations with disease and demographic factors, it was concluded that Medicare NCH claims for 5FU administration in the SEER-Medicare data set exhibit construct validity. Criterion validation studies with an external gold standard should be pursued to determine the sensitivity and specificity of chemotherapy codes in the Medicare NCH files.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Underrepresentation of Patients 65 Years of Age or Older in Cancer-Treatment TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The Performance of Different Lookback Periods and Sources of Information for Charlson Comorbidity Adjustment in Medicare ClaimsMedical Care, 1999
- Treatment Differences Between Blacks and Whites with Colorectal CancerMedical Care, 1996
- Using Medicare Claims for Outcomes ResearchMedical Care, 1994
- Bias in the Coding of Hospital Discharge Data and Its Implications for Quality AssessmentMedical Care, 1994
- Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.BMJ, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Comparing clinical information with claims data: Some similarities and differencesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Cancer treatment protocols. Who gets chosen?Archives of Internal Medicine, 1988
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987