Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality*
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (4), 1105-1112
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000259463.33848.3d
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome implications of implementing a severe sepsis bundle in an emergency department as a quality indicator set with feedback to modify physician behavior related to the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Design: Two-year prospective observational cohort. Setting: Academic tertiary care facility. Patients: Patients were 330 patients presenting to the emergency department who met criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock. Interventions: Five quality indicators comprised the bundle for severe sepsis management in the emergency department: a) initiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs; b) give broad-spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs; c) complete early goal-directed therapy at 6 hrs; d) give corticosteroid if the patient is on vasopressor or if adrenal insufficiency is suspected; and e) monitor for lactate clearance. Measurements and Main Results: Patients had a mean age of 63.8 ± 18.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 29.6 ± 10.6, emergency department length of stay 8.5 ± 4.4 hrs, hospital length of stay 11.3 ± 12.9 days, and in-hospital mortality 35.2%. Bundle compliance increased from zero to 51.2% at the end of the study period. During the emergency department stay, patients with the bundle completed received more CVP/Scvo2 monitoring (100.0 vs. 64.8%, p < .01), more antibiotics (100.0 vs. 89.7%, p = .04), and more corticosteroid (29.9 vs. 16.2%, p = .01) compared with patients with the bundle not completed. In a multivariate regression analysis including the five quality indicators, completion of early goal-directed therapy was significantly associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.79; p = .01). In-hospital mortality was less in patients with the bundle completed compared with patients with the bundle not completed (20.8 vs. 39.5%, p < .01). Conclusions: Implementation of a severe sepsis bundle using a quality improvement feedback to modify physician behavior in the emergency department setting was feasible and was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Adequacy of Early Empiric Antibiotic Treatment and Survival in Severe Sepsis: Experience from the MONARCS TrialClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Impact of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis*Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Effect of Treatment With Low Doses of Hydrocortisone and Fludrocortisone on Mortality in Patients With Septic ShockJAMA, 2002
- Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort studyIntensive Care Medicine, 2001
- Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Activated Protein C for Severe SepsisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)JAMA, 1995